Friendship: What Makes a Good Friend? :: Friendship Essays

At the point when I consider what makes somebody an old buddy, I consider all the attributes of my own companions. My individual meaning of a companion, is somebody who is consistently paying special mind to me, and will support me if I’m in a tough situation. A companion must be somebody I trust and who confides in me in return. Another significant trademark in a companion is somebody who I can converse with, and makes me snicker. One of the most significant qualities of a companion, is somebody who will support you on the off chance that you need it. One individual experience I had with this was the point at which my companions, Mark, Steve, and I we hard and fast driving around late around evening time. We were on our way home from going up to my camp at the lake, it was four in the morning, and we were completely worn out. I was driving my vehicle furthermore, we had quite recently gotten off the Northway when I ran over a glass bottle and my tire popped. I didn’t recognize what to do. We had no cash, and were abandoned. A large number of contemplations were hustling through my brain: what might I tell my mother, how might we get it fixed, and in particular how could I avoid inconvenience. My companion Mark called up his sibling to come and tow the vehicle. His activities that night made me understood that a genuine companion would faces challenges for one another. A solid fellowship likewise relies on shared trust. On the off chance that you can’t trust each other then it is difficult to set up a solid relationship. Before, I have had the option to tell my companions individual emotions, and realize that they would keep insider facts to themselves. Once my companion and I were riding on my companion James’ lawnmower and we hit the side of the carport. We guaranteed each other that we would take it to the grave. Despite the fact that we ought to have in the end told somebody, we hushed up about it. Another quality I like to have in a companion, is somebody who can make me giggle. An ideal case of this is my companion Bounce. A portion of the remarks he would state would be so ludicrous; I couldn’t help yet snicker. Once I voyaged to Montreal with my companions, and the whole four-hour drive I spent giggling. Bounce and I sat in the rearward sitting arrangement breaking jokes the entire time. This is significant on the grounds that it is acceptable to realize that paying little mind to the state of mind, or circumstance I’m in, a old buddy can make me giggle. At the point when I asked different understudies their idea on companionship, I Kinship: What Makes a Good Friend? :: Friendship Essays At the point when I consider what makes somebody an old buddy, I consider all the attributes of my own companions. My individual meaning of a companion, is somebody who is consistently paying special mind to me, and will support me if I’m in a difficult situation. A companion must be somebody I trust and who confides in me in return. Another significant trademark in a companion is somebody who I can converse with, and makes me snicker. One of the most significant attributes of a companion, is somebody who will support you on the off chance that you need it. One individual experience I had with this was the point at which my companions, Mark, Steve, and I we full scale driving around late around evening time. We were on our way home from going up to my camp at the lake, it was four in the morning, and we were totally drained. I was driving my vehicle what's more, we had quite recently gotten off the Northway when I ran over a glass bottle and my tire popped. I didn’t realize what to do. We had no cash, and were abandoned. A great many musings were hustling through my psyche: what might I tell my mother, how might we get it fixed, and in particular how could I avoid inconvenience. My companion Mark called up his sibling to come and tow the vehicle. His activities that night made me understood that a genuine companion would faces challenges for one another. A solid fellowship likewise relies on shared trust. In the event that you can’t trust each other then it is difficult to set up a solid relationship. Before, I have had the option to tell my companions individual sentiments, and realize that they would keep privileged insights to themselves. Once my companion and I were riding on my companion James’ lawnmower and we hit the side of the carport. We guaranteed each other that we would take it to the grave. Despite the fact that we ought to have in the long run told somebody, we remained quiet about it. Another quality I like to have in a companion, is somebody who can make me chuckle. An ideal case of this is my companion Weave. A portion of the remarks he would state would be so absurd; I couldn’t help yet giggle. Once I voyaged to Montreal with my companions, and the whole four-hour drive I spent giggling. Weave and I sat in the rearward sitting arrangement splitting jokes the entire time. This is significant on the grounds that it is acceptable to realize that paying little mind to the state of mind, or circumstance I’m in, a old buddy can make me chuckle. At the point when I asked different understudies their idea on fellowship, I

A Character Analysis

One of the most noteworthy characters inside Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is that of Brutus, a perplexing person whose activities have critical effect upon the occasions on the play. This paper inspects the character of Brutus and surveys both the great and terrible components of his character. An investigate of how these characteristics present inward clash inside Brutus is offered along with a clarification of the manners by which these contentions show themselves.It is the aim of this paper to demonstrate that in spite of the way that Brutus had the option to kill his dearest companions, he is basically an ethical man who kept up his respect as far as possible. One of the most huge components of Brutus’ character is his exacting goals. He is an aristocrat, â€Å"the noblest of Romans† (V. v. 75) who is unequivocally guided and impacted by issues of respect. He exhibits a nonstop fixation on acting in a manner that is correct and just and talks consistently of t he need to make a republic in Rome that is controlled by the votes of the senate instead of a solitary dictator.This makes an issue in his relationship with Caesar. Notwithstanding their dear fellowship, Brutus is worried that Caesar will ascend to power and afterward submit a demonstration of selling out by upholding a tyranny on the individuals of Rome, â€Å"climber-upward†¦ He then unto the stepping stool turns his back†¦ † (II. ii. 24,26). Plainly, for Brutus, his good and moral goals are of higher significance than his fellowship and love for Caesar and accordingly he can submit the heartless demonstration of murder.However, while the homicide itself isn't right, the way that Brutus himself accepts so emphatically in the way that his activities are to benefit Rome, involves that he does, to a degree, keep up his respect. Brutus’ resolute fixation on profound quality involves that he can be effectively convinced by others to do their will, if it is intro duced as being to benefit Rome. This uncovers a further, negative, component to his character; he is innocent. Cassius can control Brutus’ fixation on respect so as to convince him to kill Caesar, an amusing unforeseen development that on face esteem is definitely not honorable.Brutus neglects to perceive that he is being utilized by Cassius and Antony and appears to acknowledge everything on face esteem, neglecting to address realities or think about how conceivable it is that he could be bamboozled. This can be found in the manner he aimlessly acknowledges the letters from Cassius as being sent from the individuals of Rome and in this manner illustrative of their will for Cesar to be expelled. His nativity involves that he permits others to play upon his goals so as to persuade him to play out the demonstration of homicide. Notwithstanding the reality this homicide causes him anguish, â€Å"Our hearts you see not; they are pathetic; and pity to the general wrong of Romeâ⠂¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬  (III, I, 185-186), he permits Cassius and Anthony to persuade him that submitting such acts will win the hearts of the individuals of Rome, â€Å"If then that companion request why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I adored Caesar less, yet that I cherished Rome more. † (III. ii. 21-24). Brutus’ artlessness is something that he keeps with him a secret forever, even on his deathbed he accepts that he has imparted his life to valid and decent men, â€Å"My heart doth bliss that yet in for my entire life I found no man yet he was consistent with me† (V. v. 38-39). Such a guileless and believing nature permits the crowd to see Brutus as honorable.He is guiltless and trusting and really accepts that he is following up in the interest of the individuals of Rome. A further negative component of Brutus’ character is his misguided thinking. He accepts that he will win the help of the individuals of Rome since he acts to their grea test advantage. This is clear when he tends to the Roman residents in the gathering and in his general treatment of the Roman groups. He erroneously sees them as wise people who will have the option to comprehend his contemplated way to deal with the homicide of Caesar. In any case, actually the group can't comprehend his keenness and is in this way left powerless against the expressions of Antony.Here, notwithstanding Cassius’ counsel despite what might be expected, he permits Antony to have the final word at the memorial service and is along these lines by and by sold out as an immediate aftereffect of his naivety. Antony can use Brutus’ words and activities against him and create contempt and ill will in the group. A similar group that Brutus decided to be sensible and scholarly. A further noteworthy segment of Brutus’ character is that of his philosophical nature. He is an adherent to Stoicism, a way of thinking that directs living one next to the other with nature and existing in a cheerful and unconcerned way. Such a way of thinking shows itself in an apathetic manner.This can be seen when Brutus knows about the demise of his darling spouse and essentially answers, â€Å"Why goodbye Portia, We should kick the bucket, Messala† (IV. iii. 218). His unemotional nature can be viewed as a potential clarification for the manner by which he can limit his concentration to the political and moral purposes behind his homicide of Caesar. Brutus’ aloof nature is additionally improved by the way that he can put the benefit of people in general before his very own emotions. He doesn't consider Caesar a man or a companion, however as a political substance, a future tyrant, who undermines the benefit of Rome.This is one potential clarification for why he seems to show no distress for the demonstrations he has submitted or for his dead companion; he is excessively settled in his political destinations. The political focal point of Brutus ’ character ends up being a further defect that permits others to utilize him to further their potential benefit. His clear absence of feeling is something that Cassius can use when he tends to the group and persuades them that Brutus is innately awful. As perusers however we have a knowledge into Brutus’ activities and comprehend the reasons for his absence of emotion.He is so expectation on doing what he accepts to be correct that, in our eyes, he keeps up a decent picture. One of Brutus’ greatest deficiencies is his rigid nature. His obstinacy and powerlessness to adjust to the occasions that happen eventually prompts his destruction. Regardless of the way that he is so politically engaged, he neglects to play the round of governmental issues himself and in this manner leaves himself open to control. In contrast to Antony and Cassius, he can't deliberately design the best methods for accomplishing his goals, rather following up on his visually impaired confid ence that what he is doing is the thing that the individuals want.However, in spite of the fact that this is an imperfection, it is something that keeps up his respect; he isn't a cheat or a plotter on the most fundamental level. This paper has examined various Brutus’ character characteristics, both great and awful. Some of his characteristics both serve in support of himself and lead to his ruin. While he is trusting, consistent with his convictions and unfaltering, his naivety, misguided thinking and determination involve that he leaves himself powerless against the untrustworthy activities of those around him.However, it is such naivety that permits the perusers to keep up a picture of Brutus as a noteworthy man, who attempts to act to the greatest advantage of his kin. The final word on the character of Brutus is communicated amazingly well by the expressions of Mark Antony: â€Å"This was the noblest Roman of all:? All the schemers, spare just he? Did that they did in jealousy of incredible Caesar,? He, just in a general legit thought? What's more, typical acceptable to all, made one of them† (V,V, 68-72) For the characters in the play, and for the peruser, Brutus keeps up a component of noteworthiness that even his most disreputable acts can't annihilate.

The Authors Character in A Good Man is Hard to Find by Flannery OConn

â€Å"A Good Man is Hard to Find† is a short story composed by Flannery O’ Connor. O’Connor was an American essayist whose compositions constantly joined amusingness into a tragic or wrecking circumstance. Her assortments incorporate 31 short stories, two books, and two or three letters and discourses. O’Connor is generally well known for her short story works. In various works of her, her cognizant craftsmanship was uncovered and furthermore the dedicated job that Roman Catholicism plays throughout her life (Flannery) O’ Connor was brought into the world the lone youngster to her folks in Savannah, Georgia. Her dad was a realtor and her mom was naturally introduced to a conspicuous family. When O’ Connor was twelve years of age, her family moved back to her moms old neighborhood of Milledgeville, GA where her dad was additionally the city hall leader of for two or three years. Milledgeville was known as the ‘crazy’ town in Georgia. Milledgeville was home to one of the biggest mental foundations in the United States. At the time this story was composed, the medical clinic had 13,000 intellectually sick patients hospitalized there. She was encircled by insane individuals. The impact of living in Milledgeville helped her recorded as a hard copy her accounts. â€Å"A Good Man is Hard to Find† is one of O’Connor’s best and notable works. The work recounts to the tale of a typical consistently family and their excursion to Florida. The outing starts as ordinary excursions do, however then turns and there is an unforeseen contort tossed in. The family experiences a got away from criminal who named himself The Misfit. The lawbreaker and his accessories compromise the family’s’ life, yet at the same time are additionally well disposed and gracious. In a frantic endeavor to spare herself and her family, the grandma starts conversing with The Misfit disclosing to him that she accepts he truly is a g... ... work with this story and I accept any peruser can locate a person or thing in the story they can identify with and can apply the story to their consistently life. The story has numerous exercises and ethics that can be adapted yet adds a funny contort to things. So I leave with this last however, in the expressions of Wendell Berry, â€Å"Practice Resurrection!† Works Citied â€Å"Flannery O’Connor† Tegasos Literature. 1 Feb 2006. O’Connor, Flannery. â€Å"A Good Man is Hard to Find† Discovering Literature. 3 Edition. Hans P. Guth and Gabrielle Rico, Eds. Uppersaddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall,2003:(355-365)† Woodiwis, Anna. â€Å"Jesus lost everything balance† Writings @ Swarthmore. 2003. WA Program at Swarthmore College. 1 Feb 2006.

Compare Contrast Performance Enhancing Drugs

Task 4-1-1 Compare and Contrast COMM 120 College Writing Justin Reed Professor Hilton-Ross Performance-Enhancing Drugs: New degree of fervor or snappy passing? We routinely know about expert competitors being blamed for â€Å"doping,† or utilization of unlawful execution improving medications. Many do this to be the absolute best at what they do. This is worthwhile for the player, yet additionally for the establishments that acquire the groups. The inquiry that emerges is, if these medications ought to be the new boondocks of sports, or on the off chance that we ought to vigorously screen the players to forestall demise. Taking a gander at this from an unbiased point of view, it very well may be anything but difficult to see the two positives and negatives to consuming such medications. Our general public requests flawlessness, yet we additionally expect a degree of amusement that is on par or more noteworthy than the regularly expanding sticker price of the tickets that we purchase for these scenes. A significant number of the medications that are prohibited from sports are because of the reactions that frequently happen. The players have maniacal scenes, become expanding antagonistic, and in some cases even passing. Indeed, even with the proof support this, the medications are as yet utilized. The explanation behind this is money related increases. An inquiry rings a bell, okay rather carry on with a long, standard life or an abbreviated, stunning one? You will be quicker, more grounded, and recuperate more rapidly than you ever have previously. All things considered, let’s make the supposition that competitors start to utilize execution upgrading drugs, the costs are higher for tickets,and the measure of time a player will really be fit for playing at such an elevated level is diminished. Who truly wins in this situation? I accept thefans do. Fansget an extremely energizing game, more plays, more activity, and more effect. Things that were impractical become unmistakably progressively conceivable. Games are developed or improved to make the exhibition all the better. The competitors can now demandmore cash in light of the fact that the groups are more noteworthy. In turn,the swarm draw implies the establishment can improve the offices and effect the encompassing zones. Truly, the competitors have a capability of being harmed, however their penance could eventually carry bliss to thousands, give them extraordinary wealth,and help the regions organizations. References Donovan, R. J. , Egger, G. , Kapernick, V. , and Mendoza, J. (2002). A Conceptual Framework for Achieving Performance Enhancing Drug Compliance in Sport. _Sports Medicine_, 32(4), 269-284.